Friday, January 28, 2022
HomePoliticsAmerican PoliticsMO {The}.G. Schmitt: If SCOTUS Upholds Vax Mandate, Bureaucrats Could Dictate '{Bulk}...

MO {The}.G. Schmitt: If SCOTUS Upholds Vax Mandate, Bureaucrats Could Dictate '{Bulk} Mail-{within} Balloting' and Voting Changes

On Friday’s broadcast of the Fox {Information} Channel’s “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” Missouri Attorney {Common} Eric Schmitt (R) {stated|mentioned} there wouldn’t {become|end up being} any “limiting {theory|basic principle}” if the Supreme {Courtroom} upholds the Biden {management} vaccine mandate, and {there may be} decisions from bureaucrats that “it’s not {secure} to vote in-{individual} and we’ve got {bulk} mail-in balloting and political operatives {have to} {gather} grandma’s ballot.”

{

Schmitt {stated|mentioned} the case “{boils down} to the {main} question,|

Schmitt said {the entire} case “{boils down} to the {main} question,}” of “can unelected bureaucrats, {{without the} constitutional or statutory authority {pressure|push|power|drive} a {surgical procedure} on 100 million Americans?|{without the} statutory or constitutional authority force a {surgical procedure} on 100 million Americans?} The answer {compared to that} should {become|end up being} no. {And by {the real|the true} way,} {the scary thing {here’s},|the scary thing is,} if they are {effective|prosperous|productive|profitable}, if Biden {is prosperous}, {no limiting principle {here|right here} there’s.} There’s no limiting {theory|basic principle} for these {companies|firms|organizations}. {For instance}, with climate {modify|alter}, why wouldn’t he {simply} – it’s an existential threat. We’re at a tipping {stage}. {Department of {Transport} and EPA,|{Division|Section} of EPA and {Transport},} weaponize them to {proceed|move} tell you {everything you} can drive, {when you’re able to} drive, and for {just how long}. And {tag|indicate} my words, Tucker, {we’re probably {two months} {from} the midterm variant,|we’re {two months} {from} the midterm variant {most likely|possibly},} where it’s not {secure} to vote in-{individual} and we’ve got {bulk} mail-in balloting and political operatives {have to} {gather} grandma’s ballot. {After all}, the pathway to tyranny {will be|is usually|is definitely|can be|is certainly} paved with these {forms of} emergency executive orders, {which explains why} this case {is indeed} important.”

{Adhere to|Stick to} Ian Hanchett {upon} Twitter  @IanHanchett

RELATED ARTICLES

Leave a Reply

Most Popular

Recent Comments